CfP: Travelling Antiquaries (16th-19th centuries)
The travel narratives are arousing the interest to a large academic community. The travel sources document the history of the gaze and the constitution of taste, as well as the history of knowledge, from the natural sciences to archaeology, including ethnology and the history of texts. They also provide archaeologists, art historians and historians with evidence of lost works and texts, as well as precious documents on the constitution of collections.
Papers may focus on a particular
antiquarian. While several figures have been the subject of monographic
approaches, many personalities have yet to be studied. They may also focus on a
group of scholars, for example the antiquarian studies developed by certain
religious orders (Mauritians, Jesuits, etc.), thus considering the conditions
of scholarly work that are partly linked to membership. Speakers are also
encouraged to consider the reception of a particular object or monument or
monument in particular, the "journey" of an object between
collections and publications, in the vein of "object biographies".
Although the organisers expect papers on travel in Europe and beyond, the
question of exoticism will not be considered as such. The chronological field
is limited to the 16th-19th centuries, but the continuity and rupture between
the earlier and later periods may be addressed in order to question the notion
of "modernity". The organisers invite the participants to reflect on
three axes in particular:
- The conditions of the antiquarian
journey. The motivations for
travel, official or not, among which erudition was not necessarily the
most important, led to destinations and itineraries. Scholars prepared
their journeys, in particular by reading ancient or early modern texts,
sometimes accompanied by illustrations, which helped to shape their
imagination. Through this reading, how did the travelling antiquarians
follow in the footsteps of their predecessors, from Pausanias to their
contemporaries? How was their knowledge nourished by exchanges with local
people, whether scholars or not? Does the documentation shed light on the
many forgotten intermediaries (ambassadors, interpreters, workers, bazaar
merchants, sellers, draughtsmen, etc.) or on the way the natives viewed
these travelling antiquarians? What was their relationship with the
different levels of power? To what extent were these antiquarian journeys
sources of legitimisation and contributed to a form of representation?
- The relationship to objects and
monuments. What characteristics of
the objects and monuments conditioned the interest of the antiquarian?
Age? Beauty? The integrity or the state of ruin? Was the mobile object
sought after for its market value, to be taken away, collected, exhibited
in a cabinet or museum? Were objects and monuments contextualised more
widely in a landscape? What techniques and instruments were used in the
field (stamping for inscriptions, topographical surveys, calculation of
distances and measurements, sketches, etc.)? How did they go from field
notes to publication?
- Networks and careers. Contrary to the image of the scholar confined to
his "ivory tower", the antiquarian did not evolve alone and must
therefore be understood in his networks, at different geographical scales.
The field of study was the place of meetings and collaborations, but also
of rivalries and competitions. The role of travel in careers and in the
constitution of networks will thus be studied. How was the travelling
antiquarian perceived in his milieu? How were they represented (in
individual or group portraits, such as Joshua Reynolds' Society of
Dilettanti)?
Submission of a paper
Scientific Committee and organisation
Practical details